🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media originating from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials requests measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing amendments to a pending law that include reductions in the recommended coverage of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during broader worries about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Recently, global health authorities issued a warning that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying worldwide. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN summit conference,” stated the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and mandating that visual health alerts cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “according to global suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum one year after the law is enacted.

International experts in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least half of the front of a pack “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, claiming that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for different infractions “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to ten-year jail sentences”.

Business explanation

Through correspondence, the company executive of the African subsidiary says the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the related medical consequences” but asserts that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We live in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and gather the crop and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to benefit personally and all the generations of my children while my neighbor's family are dying … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative said: “BAT Zambia conducts its business in compliance with relevant national regulations. Further, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which provide for interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, adding that young individuals should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to realize planned public health goals, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which includes rising levels of black market activity”.

The country's office of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.