🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, and block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the tally frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of votes that came in later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, it was possible in which election day went somewhat badly for him, where Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, young, renters and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump last year backed the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured it could go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to get over half. He has 50.4% but remain around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so afterwards no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added all of these conservatives on the island with a high participation. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for the independent. So there existed some opposition. However no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on if the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if there were major surprises on this one, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives come from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I think that every city in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.